'The elements of style' by William Jr. Strunk

This book has taught me a lot of things that will help me in my writing. It is not true that the book does not teach anything to a person contriving to write well. For instance, you have to write a possessive pronoun as a subject of a noun-verb (gerund) when writing in formal style (“they have permitted his walking at the countryside”). Another rule that the book has taught me is avoiding indefinite subjects like “it is”, “there are” or “this is”. Instead of this, you should rewrite the phrase (“There are plenty of medlars in the princess’ garden” = “Plenty of medlars decor the princess garden”). The book contributes with many topics to a person longing to write well.
The book offers an idea about the style which is reformulating the main idea in different manners to emphasize it within a paragraph. Writing the main idea of a text in only one manner does not emphasize it. You should write the main idea in different manners because this idea remains highlighted; because the reader focuses on it, and because the text is more ordered (spoiler alert: “According to the message you are trying to communicate in your writing, you may”, the writer maintains, “relate the body of the paragraph to the topic sentence in one or more of several different ways”). Namely, you have to write the topic you are referring to in several ways so that you highlight this topic.
This book will appeal to those who want to be writers and to those who already are good redactors. This leads us to a conclusion. Reading this book should be attached to practise. Doing it without writing in the manner it teaches is useless.

'The story of English in 100 words' by David Crystal

 The author has written many books about the English language. Some of them are about grammar. Grammar, in language, is what builds the meaning of what we say and write. But this book is about semantics. It is about words which are the pieces of the language.

One strong point of the book is its method. He digs into the story of selected words. Then, he tells us which is their story. He explains their pedigree. Who the dad and the mom of each word are. Another strong point is that the stages of the History of English are very well drawn. Each stage has representative words analysed by Crystal. However, something you may miss in this book is a complete index of cites. Crystal is a very cult writer. He makes a lot of references. One would like, once finished reading, come back and look for these references.
Reading this book has been very pleasant for me. It will appeal to people who like the history (story) of English, and philological curiosities.

'Saint Thomas Aquinas' by G. K. Chesterton

 In this book, Chesterton offers clues to understand the thought of the great philosopher of the Middle Ages. Although he is not a specialist in Aquinas, he asserts that has drunk from the published books of others (J. Maritain).

Chesterton writes as an apologist. He struggles against, not only the enemies of the time of Aquinas, such as Bravante, but against the later enemies of the philosopher, such as Martin Luther, who burnt the great work of Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, and against the usual target group of Chesterton - modernists, agnostics and atheists-, such as Bernard Shaw.
The author does not swot on the theology of Aquinas, but only in his philosophy, his thought about the being, although he does it brilliantly.
This book is reader-friendly, I have read it in two days, and thought-provoking. For those who want to know what was said by the Mute Ox.

'How to read the Church fathers' by Adalbert Hamman

A strong point of this book is that all the information is well organized. There are useful maps, charts, and tables. The fathers are got together by periods. It results in a handy sourcebook.

Many fragments of texts from the fathers can be read. In each chapter, there are some representative texts from the fathers who have been dealt with at that period. 

Another strong point is that, at the end of the book, the author displays his thoughts about the issue. An interesting one is that the Church fathers are close to the period of Jesus and the composition of the New Testament. The Greek fathers were within the milieu in which the gospels and the letters of Paul were written. It is fitting to going for these writers to know the exact meaning of the Greek text of the New Testament. They are witness to that time and give us a historical reading of the last writings of the Bible.

The book, nevertheless, would have more deepen in each author. They could have been dedicated more study. 

Letter 211 by Saint Augustin, 5-8: The rule for women

Saint Augustine was a Shepherd, so he had a pastoral concern for his flock. He wrote a rule for religious men, the Praeceptum, as well as a rule for women. The latter was written in 423 for the occasion of a dispute of the religious who wanted to remove her superior. It is contained in his letter 211.

Paragraphs 1-4 seem to be a rebuke, whereas number 5-10 contains the precepts for the community. In these precepts, Augustine highlight common possession of goods, unanimity, prayer, and fasting.

The religious are not allowed to have anything of their own. They have all in common. The superior distributes food and clothes to each one according to their needs. For it is written in the Acts of the Apostles: 

They had all things in common and distribution was made to each according to they need.

The religious come from both well-to-do families and poor families. They live together, nevertheless, this must not be an occasion of pride for neither the former nor the latter. What would be the use of renouncing the earthly belongings and giving them to the poor if this is a cause of pride? They have to live in unanimity, as they were only one soul. 

Prayer has to be at the appointed time. They must avoid distractions because the heart and the lips have to work at once. 

Finally, it is important that the religious follow fasting and abstinence from food and drink. 

 

'Roald Dhal: Collected stories'

 The book consists of a compilation of 51 stories written by Roald Dahl. Some of these are settled in Greece during the German invasion in the II world war. Other ones go by on urban stages or rural ones in England.

A strong point of these stories is that they have ironical twists. Some of them present antic whirls, like in “William and Mary”, and end with unexpected outcomes, like in “Genesis and catastrophe”. The work carried out by Dahl is to set a plot that relentlessly evolves towards an unexpected denouement. Another strong point of the book is Dahl’s style. It is precise and economic. No sentence left over. The book has, nevertheless, a weak point. The narration is shallow, so even often remains in the anecdote.
Although Dahl’s books are frequently for children, the stories contained in this one are addressed to an adult audience. They will appeal to those who are keen on popular British Literature.

'Dubliners' by James Joyce

 

The book consists of a compilation of fifteen short stories. The stories are set in the city of Dublin at the beginning of the twentieth century. The thread that ensembles the stories is Dublin. Characters evolve in that stage. Each story develops its own themes. Thus in ‘Two gallants’, a couple of friends walks by Dublin while they consider whether they have had autonomy in their lives or have lived at the expense of other people. ‘The boarding house’ explains the story of an innkeeper's daughter whose honour has been sullied. In ‘The little cloud’, a fellow feels discontent about his life in comparison with a friend’s life who has travelled abroad a lot. The strength of the book is how Joyce draws Dublin. Not only does he draw its landscape, but its geography. Another strong point is the resort to symbolism. The weak point, if there is any, is that the style is a little distant. They say it is boring. I recommend reading this book with the help of an external essay so that you can get through its symbolism. It is for all fans of classics.

'Learning the virtues' by Romano Guardini

 This book consists of a proposal of ethics for the men and women of the author’s time.

The book is about knowledge of good as a cause for joy. It runs through different virtues and ends in an epilogue about justice before God.
The strongest point of the book is that it gives a positive sight of moral - it is not a stoic imposition, but something that tends to good -, and that realizes a complete effort of reflection about morale. However, its language and style have got a little dated – one should think it is written in the past century.
This book is greatly recommendable. It appeals either to people who like Romano Guardini, or those interested in dialectical theology. 

'Treatise on the Holy Spirit' by Basil of Caesarea: A commentary

Sticking with the religious issues, I wish to make a commentary on a fragment from a treatise about the nature of the Spirit by a Cappadocian father ('Treatise on the Holy Spirit', 9).

This fragment begins with the name of this trinitarian person. His proper name is 'Holy Spirit' because has nor body, neither matter. He cannot be divided. He has not a circumscribed nature, so we cannot say 'He is here' or 'there'. As a matter of fact, he is not a creature but a being with intelligence, with infiniteness, who has no limits, cannot be measured and abundantly bestows its gifts. 

The Holy Spirit communicates to all who seek sanctification. He can sanctify others, yet needs nothing: nor strength, neither addition - he is full by himself. He grants life and illumination not to everybody, but to those who are worthy of him. He shares, giving himself, as though who receives him were alone, yet is present to everyone and is given for all humanity.

The Holy Spirit dwells in the person who shares with him. This is why this person becomes spiritual and may communicate the Spirit to others. Many gifts issue from this dwelling: prophecy, wisdom, becoming like God and being destined to him.

'The power and the glory' by Graham Greene: a review

 This book is a kind of road movie set in the Mexican revolution in the twentieth century.

The novel relates the pursuing of a priest by the police and his runaway to a Northern state. During his road the priest debates between leaving his religious duties -being a sinner and a betrayer to his faith- or going on until the foreseen end, being a martyr. Its plot evolves to an unexpected end for the reader.

The strongest point of the book is the drawing of secondary characters. Thus the lieutenant, a man obsessed in haunting the priest; padre José, a regretting priest who has conformed to the law and has got married; and Maria, a peasant who had an affair with the priest. The weakness of the novel, if there is any, is some inconsistency in the priest’s character, like his easiness to getting over from his alcoholism.

This book is very recommendable. It will appeal to readers who like good literature, for it is considered as a masterpiece.

Alphabet game

Alaric Watts, a famous journalist, wrote a poem in alphabetical order in the Trifler magazine in 1817. It is a kind of alphabet game.

An Austrian army, awfully arrayed, 

Boldy by battery besieged Belgrade. 

Cossack commanders cannonading come, 

Dealing destruction's devastating doom. 

Every endeavour engineers essay, 

For fame, for fortune fighting - furious fray! 

General 'gainst generals grapple -gracious God! 

How honours Heaven heroic hardihood! 

Infuriate, indiscriminate in ill, 

Kindred kill kinsmen, kinsmen kindred kill. 

Labour low levels longest, loftiest lines; 

Men march 'mid mounds, 'mid moles, 'mid murderous mines; 

Now noxious, noisy numbers nothing, naught 

Of outward obstacles, opposing ought; 

Poor patriots, partly purchased, partly pressed, 

Quite quacking, quickly 'Quarter! Quarter!' quest. 

Reason returns, religious right rebounds, 

Suwarrow stops such sanguinary sounds. 

Truce to thee, Turkey! Triumph to thy train,  

Unwise, unjust, unmerciful Ukraine! 

Vanish vain victory! vanish, victory vain! 

Why wish we warfare? Wherefore welcome were  

Xerxes, Ximenes, Xanthus, Xavier? 

Yield, yield, ye youths! ye yeomen, yield your yell! 

Zeus', Zarpater's, Zoroaster's zeal, 

Attracting all, arms against acts appeal!

Can you notice that there is no line for j? This is because in that time j was considered a variant of i.